MORE PROOF "DR.REED" ALIEN, ARTIFACT ARE FAKE

Analysis Provides More Evidence of Fraud

3-Part Story: Page 1, Page 2, Page 3

By Royce J. Myers III

THIS STORY IS ©2002 ROYCE J. MYERS III. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. USE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE AUTHOR.

Many sources have alleged that the alien in Rutter's video utilized animatronics during the blinking sequence which is zealously referred to by Dan Iaria as "irrefutable evidence" in this scam. One source reported that Rutter likes to talk frequently and in-depth about special effects and appears to have much more than just a layman's knowledge of how such effects are employed.

An analysis submitted to UFOWATCHDOG.COM shows some very interesting items.

ABOVE: Several areas outlined showing what may be cables or wire tubes. The circled area shows what appears to be something attached to the back of the head of the alien prop. Comparing this photo with others, you can see that some photos of the alien's eyes appear to be quite a bit more bulbous than others.

Another interesting item was submitted by Rita Bennsette of Canada. Bensette was the first person to discover the straight pin on the neckline of the alien's alleged super-clothing. In the photo below, there appears to be a paint brush in the photo:

ABOVE: Is this a paint-brush? While reviewing the video of the "alien", this item is never seen during the low-grade theatrical "examination" done by Rutter. The other piece, which may be part of the "alien" skull is also there but never seen in the video.

While it would be quite easy to speculate about what the item next to the head is, and it is nothing more than circumstantial, this piece of evidence is far from circumstantial:

 

ABOVE: LEFT: Rutter's so-called Link Artifact, the bogus piece of evidence that Dan Iaria had the nerve to call extraterrestrial. RIGHT: The back lining from a carpet, which is obviously the same material. Images courtesy of Alcione.

It is indeed amazing that Jaime Maussan (pictured left) and Dan Iaria actually tried to pass this material off as, not only extraterrestrial in nature, but as some advanced form of nano-technology. There is no doubt that the material on the "link" is the same material found on the lining of a carpet. Maussan stated, "The inside part of the link artifact is not made of rubber foam, it's made of carbon nano-tubes." Maussan said this as recently as three weeks ago.

Maussan bases his conclusion on nothing even closely resembling science. Instead, Maussan presents this information to the public as being scientific based on only an "analysis" report from a long-time Maussan associate, a man named Rodolfo Garrido.

Garrido claims that a scientific analysis was performed on the so-called "Link Artifact". The evidence of this you may ask? There is absolutely not one shred of evidence that any kind of actual scientific examination has ever been completed. You can read about the bogus analysis here. Even though Dan Iaria has now taken his website offline after Rutter was exposed as a complete fraud, you can see the webpage that Iaria posted that he claimed was an analysis report by Garrido by clicking here. You can also learn a bit more about Garrido and his connection to UFOs. This poor excuse of an analysis is nothing more than some big words, a look at the history of nano-technology and some hi-tech eye candy being used in an attempt to deceive people into believing that there is some actual science behind this case. Of course, we know the "Link Artifact" is not real, Rutter is a fraud and his entire case is a lie - therefore there is no scientific evidence to back it up.

One source has informed UFOWATCHDOG.COM that Iaria and Muassan will both continue to support this UFO fraud and will now attempt to undermine the fact that Rutter has been exposed as a fraud by attempting to focus on the so-called evidence at hand. That will indeed be quite a feat considering the fact that they have no evidence other than the cheap props Rutter and his co-conspirators employed.