SEAN DAVID MORTON, 'JAMES BOND', AND THE WTC TRAGEDY

Morton Alleges Article On WTC Collapse Was Given To Him By British Intelligence Contact, Article Is Reportedly From Usenet Poster

 

UFOWATCHDOG.COM was recently alerted to an interesting post about an article appearing in Sean David Morton's Delphi Associates newsletter. The article, '007 Reporting, You Asked to See me, M?', written by someone Morton claims works for MI-6 British intelligence, alleges that the World Trade Center towers collapsing was the result of demolition charges being placed in the buildings.

The article is prefaced by Morton, referring to his so-called MI-6 contact as "James Bond", and Morton comments on the alleged credibility of his so-called source:

" The following was a report sent to me by a close friend and contact who works for the famed "James Bond" section of British Intelligence called Military Intelligence Division 6, or MI-6. He lived here in Southern California for many years, before being recalled to England.

Although he works in computers and not the Double 0 section he has been able to pass some valuable information on a number of subjects such as the murder of Princess Diana, JFK Jr.. and gave us a head's up about the "Moch-cecution" of Timothy McVeigh.

He is an impeccable source who I would trust with my life. For this issue I asked him if he could comment on his unique perspective on the events of 9/11. "

Insider information on the death of Princess Di and JFK, Jr.? The inside scoop on Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh? 911 revelations? Sounds impressive. But as you will read, it appears that sounding credible and actually being credible are entirely two different things.

" I know from personal inside sources, that a group of 30 men were arrested with camera equipment in a building near the WTC, who were filming the planes as they crashed into the towers, and that they were agents of the Mossad. "

--Sean David Morton referencing more alleged 'inside sources' for his insight into the 9/11 attacks.

Enter Usenet poster Jerry Russell and his website 911-strike.com, your not-so-average conspiracy/political action website. Russell started quite a stir on the Internet with his original posting in which he claimed that the World Trade Center collapse was the result of a planned demoliton using explosives inside the towers, not the result of the insane attacks carried out by terrorists flying planes into the structures. Russell's post received quite a bit of attention and so did Russell, mainly from people that were not too happy with his theory.

While Russell admits that his initial argument was not correct, he also says that the article he originally posted had taken on a life of its own and had been making the rounds in various circles on the Internet. Russell also says that the article has been used by others with no credit given to him as the original source. In a Usenet post, Russell tells of one of those alleged uses of his work, by none other than Sean David Morton.

In his post Russell writes, "Now the article has appeared again, but I am no longer given credit (or blame) as the author of the piece. In its latest incarnation in the Delphi Associates Newsletter (vol. 4, issue #81), it was written by a mole from inside the MI6 British intelligence service, writing under the alias of 'James Bond'. Under its new authorship, the article has been posted again to the Usenet."

Russell continues saying, " But the article as it is published in the Delphi Newsletter is not exactly in its original form. There are a few additions -- for example, a mystical reference to Nostradamus, and an approving discussion of the French 'Hunt the Boeing' web page. I suppose I did a good enough job of discrediting myself and my ideas, but "James Bond" has been able to add to the general level of hilarity by bringing in these other questionable threads. I've written to Sean David Morton of Delphi Associates to ask him how
this could have happened and how he mistook my article for something by 'James Bond'. So far, I haven't heard from him..."

Indeed, it would be difficult to have someone write an article, take credit for it, much less give you insider info, and not have been the original author to begin with. So, this leaves us with the question: Who really is the alleged Bond, James Bond that is, the alleged MI-6 agent that supposedly passed on this informtion? From where we're sitting in cyberspace, it doesn't take much to figure that one out ...